[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Bryan Stansell bryan@conserver.com
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:57:00PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > Ok, as long as it's not just something broken on my end. In fact, I > prefer to use the client. But I wonder why conserver even supports > listening on ports if the feature doesn't work... which feature is this? no where does conserver claim to implement the telnet protocol (at the server - it does do it's best while talking to term servers). it does implement a telnet-like client/server protocol (for lack of a better description). listening on ports certainly doesn't imply telnet compatibility. and, just as you can use telnet to interact with a web server and do queries, you happen to be able to use telnet to interact with conserver. but in both cases you must talk the appropriate protocol. Bryan