[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
John Newman jnn@webii.net
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
I see maybe this doesn't make sense as it seems the console program actually connects to the listening port. -- john On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:01:35PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > Just from reading the docs I can't quite see a way to disable conserver > from listening on ports altogether, except for the unix domain sockets > option. Is there a way to make it run without UDS or listening on tcp > sockets, so that only the console program can be used to access the > serial connections? > > thanks, > > -- > john > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:57:00PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:39:52PM -0700, Bryan Stansell wrote: > > > see > > > > > > https://www.conserver.com/pipermail/users/2006-March/msg00040.html > > > > > > and > > > > > > https://www.conserver.com/pipermail/users/2006-March/msg00033.html > > > > > > it's the same issue. and, like in the first referenced post, why not > > > use the client? > > > > Ok, as long as it's not just something broken on my end. In fact, I > > prefer to use the client. But I wonder why conserver even supports > > listening on ports if the feature doesn't work... > > > > Anyway, I still think it's great software. > > > > -- > > John > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@conserver.com > > https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- > John Newman > Systems Administrator, WebXess Inc. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@conserver.com > https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users -- John Newman Systems Administrator, WebXess Inc.