Re: Re: [PATCH] Power control

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:43:46PM -0700, Bryan Stansell wrote:
> And I'm all for making it more generic as well...perhaps by making the 'k' command programmable - in the sense that you can associate a command with any character ([a-z0-9]) after 'k' and give it a label so you know what the command is supposed to do.
> 
> So, 'k' for 'k'ommand...or perhaps even '!' to invoke a command?  Harder to type, but consistent with vi, for example.

Great. I vote for '!'.
Also, maybe it would be interesting to have a distinction between commands
that output something or not on std(err|out).