[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Andras.Horvath Andras.Horvath@cern.ch
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:54:08 GMT
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:11:18AM +0200, Bryan Stansell wrote: > Those two lines should be independent of themselves. In other words, > the first (pcitfiot05) logs an exitsbecause the command to bring up that > console exited (with a value of 1). The second line must be a PAM-based > LDAP error string...and if it takes down all of conserver, I'd like to > know. I don't have anything in the code to actually exit, so I'm > guessing it's the PAM library doing that. Unless you're just assuming > conserver is exiting because of the first line...which would be a bad > assumption. OK, thanks for the clarification (I did make the wrong assumption here.) This is conserver running OK on my box: [root@lxc1rg27 ~]# ps axuw | grep conserv uucp 11263 0.0 1.4 74672 14780 ? Ss Jun22 0:00 /usr/sbin/conserver -d -L /var/log/console/__server.log uucp 11264 0.0 0.1 50396 1532 ? S Jun22 0:00 /usr/sbin/conserver -d -L /var/log/console/__server.log uucp 11266 0.0 1.4 74636 14584 ? S Jun22 0:00 /usr/sbin/conserver -d -L /var/log/console/__server.log uucp 11267 0.0 0.1 50392 1544 ? S Jun22 0:00 /usr/sbin/conserver -d -L /var/log/console/__server.log root 14664 0.0 0.0 61148 704 pts/0 R+ 10:48 0:00 grep conserv [root@lxc1rg27 ~]# After the crash/exit/whatever, there were still three threads hanging around but the network port was closed. I'll try to reproduce the issue with -D. > Running in debug mode (-D) might help see things too. Do you get any > "CheckPass():" entries in the log file? PAM issues should be logged not without -D, and it's not easy to force this issue but I'll try to get it back again. Andras