[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Bryan Stansell bryan@conserver.com
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:21:31 GMT
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:12:02PM -0500, Bill Peck wrote: > I provided a patch to support this ages ago but it was never accepted > upstream. Not saying it was the best of code.. but it did work. Sorry about that...it certainly got lost amonst things - and I never got back to looking at it. On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:26:56AM +0100, Fabien Wernli wrote: > That being said, a more general 'execute external command on keystroke' > would be the way to go, IMHO. But then again maybe that's what this is about > anyway. Yep, I'd agree. The patch from Bill is certainly a good start at that. There's a lot of work to make things that wouldn't block on I/O, can be interrupted, supports two-way communication, etc, but a good idea. Sort of like ^Ec|, but server-side. I envision commands that would either interact with the console itself or with the user. But maybe just the user would be sufficient for most cases. Bryan