[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Harris, David (IT Solutions US) david.k.harris@siemens.com
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:52:56 -0800 (PST)
I'm not sure why I might use that type of feature. (I prefer to log all of the time, versus defaulting a bunch to "down"...I only have one device that spews ~120-160 MB/Day, which I normally 'down' unless I suspect I'm having trouble with the device. It is the debug port on a Cisco Firewall Service module, one of a redundant pair...I keep the 'other' FWSM debug port UP, since it's idle, unless something goes wrong and the two blades failover. If the other logfile is starting to grow, I know I need to go find out what forced the failover.) -Z- David 'Zonker' Harris Silicon Valley Service Delivery Center, Network Operations Siemens IT Solutions and Services, Inc. Infrastructure Management Services 39600 Eureka Drive Newark, CA 94560 Tel: 510 624-5524 Fax: 510 624-5508 mailto: david.k.harris@siemens.com www.usa.siemens.com/it-solutions -----Original Message----- From: Fabien Wernli [mailto:wernli@in2p3.fr] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 10:46 AM To: Harris, David (IT Solutions US) Cc: users@conserver.com Subject: Re: RE: down a bunch of consoles On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:12:58AM -0800, Harris, David (IT Solutions US) wrote: > From the client (communicating with any individual host), you can > use [ctrl]+[e], [c], [d] to "down" that port. yeah I used that in an expect script to down many at once. Not very reliable :o) > simply comment out the lines associated with those ports, and then > -HUP the main Conserver process. (And you can re-enable them later by > editing the file and deleting that lead-# comment marker, and then > re-HUP-ing the main process again). yeah sure but I dont like it because: 1) I like to keep my conserver.cf files in sync between my 6 conservers which means I have a cron to do that. 2) I believe it's a maintenance task, which should be handled by 'console' it'd be kind of cool to be able to 'console -u' to check nobody's connected to some consoles, then 'console --down <list of consoles>'. I mean there's a mechanism for downing a console. Why not one for many? thanks for your time