[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Marion Hakanson hakansom@ohsu.edu
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
david.k.harris@siemens.com said: > If you have bursty traffic, it sounds like it's the JetStream, based on > what you have said. (You indicated that the Rack+ doesn't exhibit the symptom > when connected to the same serial ports, if I understand you correctly.) Yes, both units are connected to the LOM ports on identical Sun V120's. > You may find a serial setting, but it may also be that the CPU of the > JetStream can't keep up with the high rates during prolonged bursts. Another > option is that the serial rate may be too slow, and the CPU is time-slicing > to check all of the other ports before getting back to the next batch from > the busy port(s). We're running at the V120 default serial settings 9600bps, 8/N/1, no flow control running at all. Haven't seen signs of lost characters, so the "CPU too slow" scenario seems unlikely, especially at these speeds. > If the higher data rate works, it may indicate that the JetStream has an > issue polling the various ports. This could point to an issue handling the > interrupts from the UARTs, or servicing a busy network interface. (Are you > attaching the JetStream to a switch port, or a busy hub?) Nothing's busy yet; Just one serial port for testing so far, and it's a switched 10/100 network with not much going on. When I asked about tuning, I was wondering if there wasn't a poll-type setting which could be changed. Given the low-speed nature of this environment, going to a more interrupt-driven scenario in order to get smoother output would be an acceptable trade-off. Cabling, adapters, and V120's are capable of doing CTS/RTS flow control, so I'll see about trying higher port speeds to see if things go a little more smoothly. Maybe with flow-control enabled the JetStream will use a different algorithm, or as you said, the faster baud rate may just make it work harder and/or poll faster. Thanks and regards, Marion