[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Phillip Pacheco ppacheco@genesyslab.com
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you for the prompt response. I am afraid I don't know what you mean about access.c entries showing up. Where will they show up? Should I run conserver in daemon mode, try to connect with console, then run conserver -D a second time? I tried just that, and found no access.c entries. I also tried console -v unixlab2 but that did not show anything useful. Then I recalled that the console command has many of the same switches as conserver, so I ran this: {unixlab2}/usr/local/etc> console -D -D -D unixlab2 There were many lines created of course but this one seems to be the only relevant (or at least the most salient): console: DEBUG: [console.c:465] GetPort: hostname=XXXXX.genesyslab.com (console), ip=199.XX.XXX.XXX, port=782 *X'ed out the hostname & IP for security reasons. This confirms my initial fears: We have an extensive pre-existing conserver network in our production environment using 7.1.3. unixlab2 is not mentioned anywhere in the config of the production network, yet somehow it attempts to reference one of the other conserver servers. This raises new questions: 1. Can I integrate an 8.1.1 server with the pre-existing 7.1.3 network? (eventually we will upgrade the whole network) 2. How can I separate this test environment from the production environment? Thanks again for your attention to this matter. Your efforts are greatly appreciated. Phillip Pacheco WIS-UNIX -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Stansell [mailto:bryan@conserver.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 2:10 PM To: Phillip Pacheco Cc: Bryan Stansell; users@conserver.com Subject: Re: Permissions problems with conserver 8.11 On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:02:39PM -0700, Phillip Pacheco wrote: > I ran conserver -D as you suggest, but there are no access.c entries. I > can see the readcfg entries which deal with the access section, see > below. Could there be something wrong with my config file which causes > conserver not to properly recognize the access section, or to not > properly translate it into access.c commands? the access.c entries will show up once you try and connect with the client. unless you're connecting to another conserver daemon, it'll show something. running 'console -v <console>' might show interesting things as well. the combination of those should show something. Bryan