[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Greg A. Woods woods@weird.com
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:33:01 -0800 (PST)
[ On Thursday, March 4, 2004 at 05:59:50 (-0800), Bryan Stansell wrote: ] > Subject: anyone use conserver with vt100s? > > yeah, i've used ascii terminals in computer rooms before (for when > things get really bad), but i've never tried emulating a vt100 and > sending the PF* keys. '^Ec' is just too easy for me to type. > > i was also thinking folks might be using an xterm (or some such) and > defining keys to send PF* sequences. yes, some emulators faithfully mimic vt100 PF* keys (and indeed I think even xterm can do that) > but, if you're doing that, why not > just define them to send '^Ec' sequences instead...unless it's built-in > and you're counting on it (but you still have to override the escape > sequence). Well the more appropriate question is whether or not anyone's using an application which expects the user to send those sequences. If so then one might also ask whether it's a libcurses (terminfo or termcap) based application and whether or not the user has the ability and skills to modify their termcap/terminfo entries as well as their terminal emulator settings. -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@robohack.ca> Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com> Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>