[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
George Lenzer George.Lenzer@cpl.org
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Hopefully I am posting in the right place. My organization has run into a situation where we are looking for an alternative to the DEC Polycenter product to monitor consoles with our DEC 90Ms. From what I gather, it looks as if Conserver may be the answer. I've downloaded the source code and compiled it (on a Linux x86 box) and successfully ran the 'make test'. I also copied the sample conserver.cf file to /usr/local/etc and edited it to reflect the terminal server we'd like to monitor. However, I am a little confused about how conserver actually gets configured to talk to the DEC 90M. Here is what I have in my conserver.cf file for out terminal server (90aut1 on 10.0.1.250): console 90aut1 { master localhost; type host; host 10.0.1.250; port 1; } I was unsure of what context the 'port' option was meant. Is it the physical port on the 90M, or a TCP port that the 90M should be configured for? Has anyone else had experience using DEC 90Ms? And... if this isn't the right place to ask, where should I ask. Alas, Google searches haven't turned up much that is useful in regard to terminal servers like the 90M. We aren't interested in going to multiple serial ports. Thanks, George