[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
cfowler cfowler@outpostsentinel.com
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
What about SOKEEPALIVE? On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 17:43, bryan@conserver.com wrote: > Quoting Corey Hirschman <corey@rentec.com>: > > I was wondering if there is any way for conserver to test the > > connection > > between itself and the consoles it is aware of. > > you know, that's a good question. i'm not sure if there is, but it > would be an interesting feature to add. perhaps, since most terminal > vendors use the "reverse-telnet" stuff we can send a noop-type telnet > escape sequence if there hasn't been activity. but, that doesn't > really help in other cases, such as an ssh connection done via the > "|/usr/local/bin/ssh..." type syntax...that too will just sorta hang > and not notice an abrupt drop in a terminal server. > > so, for a general case, i don't have any good ideas...but perhaps we > can do something for the telnet-based terminal servers. > > anyone have any other bright ideas? some socket-level thing we can do? > although that doesn't help the ssh-type stuff...ugh. > > we can't send regular traffic, that's for sure. > > Bryan > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@conserver.com > https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users > >