[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Bryan Stansell bryan@conserver.com
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 02:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 08:48:14AM +0100, Nicholas.Penney@uk.ing.com wrote: > I have tried and tried but cannot get the \r~^b key sequence to cause a > break whilst connected to any of my servers using the CS9000's, however they > DO respond when I attach direct using a vt100 console! i was curious, so i took a quick peek at the cs9000 docs that are online. i couldn't find anything except for the 'set telnet' command. there's a 'mapnl' option that looks interesting. a 'show telnet line 1' should show if it's on for line 1. i'd bet it shouldn't be. the 'mode' option probably should be off as well. i'm thinking that either the CR is being mapped to NL or a NL is being inserted or some other such manipulation is being done and therefore the sun isn't seeing the right sequence. at least, that's my theory - based on no real idea of what those options are supposed to do since they aren't documented well. > The servers I tested (Netra's) do respond to a #. sequence to cause them to > drop to the LOM prompt, and from there I can do a reset but it's "just not > right". i agree, but it's at least a fallback position. > Even though I haven't got the "alternate break sequence" for Sun's working > yet, could you look at introducing the 0.5 second delays in the sequence as, > as I read it, they are needed. yeah, i'm looking into it no matter what. just not sure how to deal with the code yet. Bryan