[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
David Harris zonker@certaintysolutions.com
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:30:11 -0800
Actually two very important points have been made here; 1) Lots of things can cause BREAK, even when there is nothing plugged into the console port! (And you may be able to build some protecting into the device itself by performing some electrical surgery on your devices serial port.) 2) In most cases (where Conserver is concerned) folks will have something plugged into the serial console all the time, so it would be better to use a device that doesn't send BREAK when the power to the device is removed, or even when the port is reset. (This reduces the chance thatyou will induce a BREAK when changing cables, etc.) I also appreciate that both writers took time to provide additional pointers, and to provide some explanations to help fill out their premises. :-) While I appreciate the input, I wanted to explain a couple of things that have driven my web pages; a) I've been hacking serial for a long while, and I've found a lot of trouble sources while working in all aspects of communications hardware design, repair, and support. While you *could* try to document it all, the audience of folks interested in reading it all would be pretty small. (The reason why you can't find many good, *complete* books on the topic is because the book publishers don't see a market.) b) Most folks searching the web for serial stuff are looking for specific, concise information. I've tried to make my pages fit that criteria. (And the feedback from readers has generally been positive. ;-) c) The vendors of console gear really haven't *used it* in the reverse-TCP mode...tested, yes, but they haven't really deployed it in their own shops, and used it for remotely accessing machines...as a result, they haven't seen some of the problems. With that said, most of the vendors *are* interested in feedback, and improving their products. (Note that I said *"most"*...) d) In most cases, fixing the BREAK-on-power-cycle problem *did* require a hardware redesign...but many vendors have made those changes, because they are hearing back from customers that "there is a problem", but many of those same customers couldn't explain *why* things were bad. (Hardware redesign takes time, and costs money. If the vendor is selling a product to a large market, it will benefit them to make a better product. If a vendor only serves a small market, or they have a lot of the 'bad' product in their inventory, it is harder to convince them to make the investment.) e) The BREAK problem really only affects older SUN boxes, and some SGI models...while it's a big market, it's only a *part* of the total market for this type of device. (If you only have one or two SUN boxes, it may be cheaper to use the NuData adapters (at $100 per port...), but if you have two dozen sun boxes to protect, it's going to be cheaper to get a console server that doen't send BREAK until you want it to. And this can be a dynamic equation, if you are small now, but considering growing in the next year or two. :-) I'm really glad for Celeste Stokley's pages. There is lot's of good information there, including the older, legacy stuff. For those searching for as much knowledge on a topic as they can find, knowing the legacy stuff is also important. (and I'm thrilled that she thinks my pages are useful enough to list there. :-) I don't mean to stifle a detailed discussion of RS-232 and EIA-232 standards and specifics (and normal deviations and etc.), but I don't know how many folks would want to read about it. (And I'm wondering if many others might consider it all just extra noise on the list.) I'm happy to continue the thread in the topic is because the book publishers don't see a market. email if folks want. Of course, post to the list whatever you feel is relavant for the list. :-) Regards, -Z-