[Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Bryan Stansell bryan@conserver.com
Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:16:09 -0800
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:18:30PM -0000, Glenn Grimes wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has reverted to the automatic reconnection and if > so do they have a patch file that I could use as I would like/need conserver > to log what is going on during the boot process etc. I'm hearing more and more about this issue. I'd really like to find a nice way for conserver to try and reopen the lines once or maybe twice and then fallback to shutting things down, but I haven't put enough thought into the code. For those that would like to get the old behavior back (well, something close to the old behavior), look at line 799 of conserver/group.c. You'll see: /*ConsInit(pCEServing, &rinit, 0); */ ConsDown(pCEServing, &rinit); Just comment out the ConsDown and uncomment the ConsInit... ConsInit(pCEServing, &rinit, 0); /*ConsDown(pCEServing, &rinit);*/ I'm beginning to believe that the ConsInit is the right thing to do and that the number of folks experiencing the random high load/respawn problem is very small compared to the number of folks that would benefit from automatically reconnecting on a disconnect. Bryan