RE: Sun alternate break

Title: RE: Sun alternate break

Yes, changes will need to be made to Conserver.  I recoomend getting a Terminal Server that does not send a break rather than using one that does.  Many models support that feature.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ernie Oporto [mailto:Ernie.Oporto@viragelogic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:33 AM
To: users@conserver.com
Subject: RE: Sun alternate break

What I meant was, does applying that patch require anything special to be done to conserver, or does the Solaris kernel for that client understand the break from conserver and interpret it correctly?  I didn't want to patch conserver so that all machines it manages now have to make use of that alternate break.  Only one machine might be set up like that, so that machine should still be "breakable", just not from those inadvertent disconnects.

 

Ernie

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Fowler [mailto:ChrisF@computone.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:32 AM
To: 'Ernie Oporto'; users@conserver.com
Subject: RE: Sun alternate break

Yes,

You need a patch and you must hae a sun support agreement to receive that patch.  Call SunSolve and they'll give it to you.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ernie Oporto [mailto:Ernie.Oporto@viragelogic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:05 AM
To: users@conserver.com
Subject: Sun alternate break

Is there a way to set a flag for Sun machines individually that have had
this change made to them...

http://sunsolve.sun.com/private-cgi/retrieve.pl?type=0&doc=srdb%2F20427&disp
lay=plain

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@conserver.com
https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users